AshCom
CIC considered Derbyshire Dales District Council’s SPD “DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS
SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT – CONSULTATION DRAFT 2019” at two Operational
Executive meetings in October and November 2019.
The
following comments on the SPD were unanimously approved by AshCom CIC as their
formal response to the consultation document.
AshCom
CIC’s response on the S106 SPD should be seen as a start of a process of
positive partnership working with Derbyshire Dales District Council, Ashbourne
Town Council and other community organisations in Ashbourne to ensure that S106
funding is targeted on the sustainable regeneration of the town.
AshCom
CIC considered Derbyshire Dales District Council’s SPD “DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS
SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT – CONSULTATION DRAFT 2019” at two Operational
Executive meetings in October and November 2019.
The following comments on the SPD
were unanimously approved by AshCom CIC as their formal response to the
consultation document.
1.
Overview
of SPD
The
SPD is welcomed as a further elaboration of the Local Plan. Specifically, clarification of new priorities
for future S106 agreements which are in addition to the standard affordable
housing, education, highways and open space components, are welcomed. These include:
· Local
sports and recreation facilities
· Local
health services
· Green
infrastructure
· Faster
broadband communications
More
locally for Ashbourne the SPD emphasises 'Congestion in Ashbourne Town Centre'
and education provision at QEGS.
The inclusion of congestion in Ashbourne Town Centre
is a new S106 element and is supported.
2. Affordable Housing:
The
SPD focuses heavily on affordable housing, which has traditionally been DDDC's
main emphasis on S106 agreements. The
SPD outlines new 'tariffs' for affordable housing at £46,209 per unit for
off-site provision as well as a 3% contribution at £1,491 per dwelling towards
the District Council's housing enabling role.
The
SPD mentions for the first time that S106 agreements need to take into account
the result of any parish housing needs assessments (HNA). Ashbourne may have the only Neighbourhood
Housing Assessment within the Derbyshire Dales, which was commissioned by the
Ashbourne Neighbourhood Plan Group on behalf of Ashbourne Town Council.
Using
the Ashbourne Housing Needs Assessment as the basis for future affordable
housing S106 agreements on Ashbourne development proposals is also to be
welcomed. This should ensure that the
significant S106 that has been negotiated on Ashbourne developments is used to
meet housing need in Ashbourne. This has
not been the case over the last few years despite DDDC agreeing £3.55 million
for affordable housing on Ashbourne developments.
More
importantly the Director of Housing stated on a planning application for a
revision to the Leys Farm scheme in 2019 that there was no need for further
affordable housing in Ashbourne since current supply of affordable homes exceeded
demand. On the basis of this the
planning committee agreed a S106 agreement for sport & leisure on Ashbourne
Recreation Ground at £71,573. This was
the first time that such a community led S106 initiative has been
approved.
If
DDDC is stating that no more affordable housing is required in Ashbourne, S106
agreements on affordable housing should no longer be applied on Ashbourne
development schemes. Instead monies to
the level that would have been asked for on affordable housing should now be applied
on other Ashbourne priorities, such as tackling Town Centre congestion as well
as further expenditure on sport & leisure. Importantly it should be the community through
the Ashbourne Town Council and other local community organisations that
establishes neighbourhood S106 priorities as clearly stated in the Ashbourne
Neighbourhood Plan through the preparation of a Community Infrastructure Plan.
3. Open space and Sport & Leisure
It
is good to see these key areas for investment in Ashbourne being given greater
emphasis for future S106 investment. The
fact that Derbyshire Dales has one of the few playing pitch strategies in
England with clear project priorities puts the District Council ahead of the
game in securing external funding for sport and community projects. The need for investment in improving sports
facilities on Ashbourne Recreation Ground is emphasised in the District
Council’s playing pitch strategy and should be a priority for future S106
agreements on future development schemes in the Ashbourne area.
The
SPD unfortunately does not spell out in the same detail as affordable housing
the financial model for securing S106 agreements. This should be made clear in the SPD and must
relate to the real costs of future sports/community and open space projects
rather than some academic assessment of need.
In
addition, AshCom CIC feel the following open spaces/community areas should be
given priority for future S106 investment:
· Ashbourne
Recreation Ground – Bandstand refurbishment and play areas for all ages.
· Henmore
path walkway
· Civic
Square, adjacent to Ashbourne Library
4. Town Centre congestion in Ashbourne
Apart
from a reference that this is an important issue and a clear S106 opportunity
little more is said in the SPD on what are the issues/potential projects under
this new addition to S106 priorities. There
needs to be definition of what is included within the ‘Congestion in Ashbourne
Town Centre’ S106 heading. AshCom CIC believe that this should include measures
that would reduce traffic congestion such as:
· traffic
and environmental improvement schemes in the town centre
· pedestrian
initiatives to promote walking and healthy living
· measures
to reduce traffic pollution
· marketing
and promotion of the town centre as a pedestrian friendly environment
5. Annual Monitoring
The
SPD report states that the District Council produces an Annual Report. However,
AshCom CIC finds DDDC's Annual Report on S106 limited and difficult to read. There is no way to evaluate how much of the
S106 funding agreed on Ashbourne development schemes has been allocated to
promoting sustainable development in Ashbourne as required by planning law.
Therefore,
AshCom CIC feels that the District Council’s Annual Monitoring Report on S106
should be much more transparent and clearer along the lines of the West Suffolk
District Council S106 Annual Report: http://www.westsuffolk.gov.uk/planning/Planning_Policies/upload/THE-S106-ANNUAL-REPORT-2019-db-edite...
Conclusion
AshCom
CIC’s response on the S106 SPD should be seen as a start of a process of
positive partnership working with Derbyshire Dales District Council, Ashbourne
Town Council and other community organisations in Ashbourne to ensure that S106
funding is targeted on the sustainable regeneration of the town.
AshCom
CIC welcomes the opportunity to discuss with the District Council the most
appropriate way to do this.